Football is one of the most popular sports in the world. This game has undergone a remarkable evolution in recent years. Indeed, the game has become more intense and more beautiful to see. This evolution of football brings players to become faster, more enduring and stronger. These players adapt so well to this new style of games to the point where they wonder if they use anabolic steroids to hold up. In recent years, the services of the world agency doping and other actors in the fight against doping are suspicious of the use of prohibited substances by players. While international football institutions like FIFA try to dissuade the world by arguing that the sport is based on players' technical performance, the many cases of doping products prove the opposite. Do footballers really use anabolic steroids to strengthen their level of games?
Is football different from other sports?
Even if the technique is the strong point of football, there are still other abilities to have. Holding 90 minutes of field play is not an easy task. Indeed, footballers must have stamina, speed, strength and flexibility.
During a football match, players have to run at different rhythms. Most of the time, the race is intense given the speed of the game in recent years. In these conditions, the footballer may need more stamina and strength than a runner athlete. The rider tends to keep the same pace of racing which can tire me quickly as a footballer. In addition to running, football players have to jump very high times to kick the ball or to avoid an obstacle. All of these actions require strength and flexibility to prevent injury. Football can be compared to speed, running and a little gymnastics.
Why would football players not use anabolic steroids like athletes?
According to the latest report from the World Anti-Doping Agency, athletics is the second sport in which anti-doping rule violations have been identified after bodybuilding . Indeed, 242 athletes used banned substances. Football is in sixth place behind weightlifting, cycling and powerlifting. These first figures can already give us an insight into the use of Anabolic Steroids in sports especially in football.
Although the effectiveness of anti-doping tests has always been questioned, these figures still provide a global vision of the use of anabolic steroids in sports.
Taking into account certain information, the doping in football is much more important than what we want us to believe.
Doping in football would be a collective affair?
Even though football authorities have for a long time concealed the use of steroids anabolic by the players, several doping cases were unveiled.
The French anti-doping agency had conducted a study in 2009 on the use of a specific anabolic steroid: DHEA (dehydroepiandrosterone). Following this investigation, 7 footballers tested positive on 32. At the time, coach Jürgen Klopp has always supported the idea that doping is not about football. In the German newspaper Die Zeit, Jürgen Klopp said: "I say it with conviction, there is no doping in football". 6 years later, one of the best players he trained was positive control. This is the French Mamadou Sakho who was playing Liverpool right now. Moreover, he was not the only player tested positive during this season. Arijan Ademi, Dinamo Zagreb's 5 number had also been tested positive for the use of anabolic steroids. Which earned him a suspension of 4 years by UEFA.
The results of a study conducted between 2008 and 2013 on doping were conclusive. On 879 urine samples collected during the Euros and the European Cup, 68 samples contained abnormally high levels of Testosterone. It is therefore very likely that 68 players use anabolic steroids to improve their performance.
The biggest doping case in football was that of Juventus of Turin. Even if he'EPO was not found during the searches carried out on the premises of the Juventus team, the investigators remain convinced that this substance was used by the players. In place, the investigators discovered a lot of drugs so the players did not really need. Even though the use of banned products has not been proven, players were receiving much more medical treatment than needed. What purpose?
Football has long been considered a clean sport. The main players in this sport wanted to make the world believe that anabolic steroids were not useful in football and better still that they are not used at all. But today, with the various doping cases that have erupted around the world and especially in high-level football, it would simply be naïve to continue to think so. Football has a lot of similarities with sports like running and speed, which require someendurance, strength, speed and flexibility. Why do we talk about doping in athletics and not in football? Especially since football has evolved in terms of speed of games and matches that are becoming more and more frequent. It is normal for footballers to be able to use anabolic steroids to boost their performance in the field.